Stamford Select Board

2025-11-20 · regular meeting
All meetingsDashboardSearchTopics← previousnext →

Stamford Select Board — 2025-11-20 (Regular)

3 min · town drive · audio · minutes (town PDF) · markdown
Nancy L. BushikaMichael G. DenaultKurt GamariDouglas Wrightabsent: John Dunn
Session: Regular · **Duration:** 3 min · Audio · Minutes
Short 3-minute continuation (Part 2 of 2) of the November 20, 2025 regular selectboard meeting. The board reported out of executive session that the litigation was settled in favor of the town, and a motion to appoint Nancy Bushika to the assessor clerk position was carried (3 in favor, 1 abstain, with Bushika recusing herself). The board briefly discussed the assessor clerk hourly rate (around $20/hour; to be finalized at the first December meeting), noted the still-open paid lister position, and adjourned.
On the agenda

Motions (2, 2 passed)

Appointment of Nancy Bushika to the assessor clerk position Speaker 1passed
“I'd like to make a motion that we appoint, hire Nancy Bushika for the assessor clerk position.”
Chair counted 'one, two, three, abstain.' Nancy Bushika recused herself ('I recuse myself out, yeah'); a 'Second' is heard within Speaker 1's turn but is not attributed to a speaker. A separate attendee (Speaker 3) stated 'I was not in the executive session.'
Vote: 3-0 (1 abstain)
Adjournment Speaker 1passed
“Motion to adjourn.”
No vote count stated. A 'Second' is heard from Speaker 2 but is not clearly attributed as a second.

Other decisions

Litigation settled in favor of the town (reported out of executive session)The board reported out of executive session that 'the litigation was settled in favor of the town.'

Who owes what (2)

ActionOwnerBy whenNoteWhere it stands
Consider reaching out to the other (unsuccessful) applicant about the still-open, paid lister position, if she would be interested in getting involved with the town——Raised by Speaker 1; no specific owner or deadline assigned.open
no date in the minutes
¶ ¶6
Discuss/confirm the assessor clerk hourly rate—first meeting in DecemberPay was not determined in this session: 'The first meeting in December... We can discuss it again.'open
no date in the minutes
Statuses come from data/action_status.json, which only a person changes; "overdue" means the minutes gave a date and that date has passed. Mark one done with scripts/action_status.py --done "a phrase".

Money (1)

Assessor clerk hourly rate (new appointment)The board discussed a rate around $20/hour; figures quoted for the present incumbent's rate (20/21/22) are garbled in the transcript and no final rate is clearly settled. A '100 bucks an hour' remark appears to be a joke. Pay to be discussed at the first December meeting.$20/hour (discussed; not final)

Follow-ups named in the minutes

What the extraction was unsure about

Transcript

33 paragraphs · 2 of the diarized voices in this recording carry a name; the rest stay "Speaker N" because the archive cannot match them to the minutes without guessing.
33 paragraphs
Speaker 1 — no voiceprint match
Speaker 2 — no voiceprint match

Speaker 1: I was not in the executive session.

Speaker 2: Somewhere down there.

Speaker 1: Somewhere it's on there.

Transcribed 2026-09-04 (faster-whisper large-v3, CUDA; names corrected per data/name_fixes.json). Names corrected against the minutes. Diarization is automated and over-splits one person into several labels. Raw model output with timestamps: SRT.